Eu4 ideal army composition.

Lets say its the part of the game where you should start shifting over to artillery, Tech 13 I believe. What is your preferred army template? I use 4 Inf, 2 Cav, 4 Artillery. For intents and purposes this is for nations that dont really have unit bonuses, so not Poland/Hungary/Hordes or whoever that Eastern European nation is with the good …A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the grand strategy game Europa Universalis IV by Paradox Development Studio. ... +1 yearly army tradition, +10% morale and +5% discipline. HM to Wallachia with +5% discipline, +1 land leader shock, +20% manpower and +20% manpower recovery.TL;DR: Some army composition rules are the same no matter who you're playing, so to start with those: Always build your army frontline (infantry + cavalry) to fill the combat width + 2 or 4 more regiments (e.g., with a combat width of 20, target a mix of 22 or 24 inf + cav regiments). In the lands that hordes typically fight in this will ...Go to eu4 r/eu4 • by ... Genral rule: Army composition depends on what modificators you go for, but for the basic normal army you have 2 cav and fill up the rest of your combat width with infantry. You have as much artillery as you can pay for with these basics. This changes of course if you play a cav heavy nation like poland or the hordes ...Edit: So from what I read the ideal composition should be 16 inf, 4 cav, 20 arty. 4 cavalry because more is useless, infantry to fill the numbers and 20 artillery because you have to have the same number of arty and frontline units for balanced damage and morale. Archived post. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. 5. 24 Share.

Yeah, but you use a bunch of loopholes, pretty much landing squarely in the "lo nope, that's not supposed to happen." Long story short, you start as Crimea, conquer west until you eat most of Poland's land and can keep Lithuania under control, then conquer a bunch of land in the HRE until you can culture shift to german and form Westphalia, this changes you to a monarchy without reforming your ...Remember that the "optimal composition" works on the assumption that money is not an issue. If you're at a point where you can't field an army 1.5 *CW of infantry and 1.0* CW of arty (which will be a significant portion of the game, especially if you're not blob crazy), the relative value of infantry and arty can change drastically.

My understanding from what I remember is that your cavalry/infantry ratio effectively lets you have a certain number of cavalry attacking compared to your combat width, so if you have 12 combat width and 25% C:I ratio, you can have 4 cavalry dealing flanking damage.

This is a bad army composition as all of your cannons will be on the front row, where they take a lot of damage. Personally if I had a 20 stack I'd go for 16 infantry and 4 cavalry, no cannons assuming I'm going up against another similarly sized or larger army. If they were smaller, then cannons could sit safely on the second row.13K. 450K views 2 years ago EU4 Mechanics Guides. An EU4 Army Composition Guide focusing on the best army composition that europa universalis 4 has to offer. Both a great army...Cavalry heavy armies are just a nightmare to micromanage and one of the things I wish Paradox would recode: As a novice at EU4, I loved playing Poland. I would go 10/10, or 12/8 infantry/cavlary armies and I would get shredded because my infantry died and then I took a huge tactics penalty because I had too much cavalry to infantry ratio.Im currently playing as Germany and I just want to know what a good army composition would be. Its late game if anyone has a good composition that pairs well with Prussian ideas please share. ... The basic idea is infantry + cavalry goes in front, and artillery goes in the back. The fundamental rule is have a lot of cannons at the back, but ...But after 1.33 the composition doesn't seem to work as good as before. I barely win any fights and in most of my fights it seems like I'm starting with half the morale of my enemy. I've read the dev diaries and if I understand it correctly, the combat changes make filling up combat width more important than it was before the update.

Arumba teaches EU4 to Civilization player FilthyRobot (patch 1.18) Arumba's New Player Tutorial Series (patch 1.20) Arumba teaches EU4 to Monk004 (patch 1.28) Beginner's Guide to Coalitions 1, 2. General tip collection thread. How to revert to an older patch. Reman's War Academy Volume I - Army Composition and Basic Combat. Administration

This is the correct answer. While horde cav is less inefficient than other cav in terms of power for money, you're still better off using infantry - especially since the hordes usually do not have a great economic situation for most of the game.

A case can be made for 4 units of cavalry per stack only if you are both rich (which Brandenburg isn't) and lack manpower (which shouldn't happen either) in order to conserve manpower (at the cost of more army maintenance) when defeating stacks that are smaller than yours and smaller than the combat width.351 votes, 34 comments. 323K subscribers in the eu4 community. A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the grand strategy game…It's accurate to have wastelands in these provinces for balance, but also 2 other reasons: 1: They were isolated, 'undiscovered' or otherwise inaccesible well into the 19th century, it would be ahistorical for them to be provinces. 2: Technology didn't allow these areas to be colonised. Railways and steam vessels were a major development that ...Late game army composition should be guided by your combat width (check the military screen stats). This is between 34 and 40 late in the game. You definitely want to have that many artillery regiments in every major battle, and that many frontline units to cover the artillery too, preferably a few more to act as reinforcements.Tech 7: add at least 1 cannon to the fighting stack, to get +1 at siege. You may additionally make 10/0/10 siege stack, not for fighting and just for fast siege of forts level 1-3, since they are the most common. 10 infantry may be replaced with 10-16 infantry mercenaries. Tech 16 (latest tech 22): delete cavalry and fill your army with combat ... 16/4/20. If I'm not mistaken, the optimal army composition consists of your combat width full of artillery, 40% of the width of cavalry and then 60% multiplied by 1.5 the width of infantry. So basically, if your combat width is 20, you should have 20 artillery, 8 cavalry and 18 infantry. 6:4 cav/artillery for Polish horde. Well, when playing a horde nation there's no support limit for cavalry, so 100% cavalry armies are possible. The nomad tech group also starts you off with relatively strong units. If you mix in some cavalry combat ability and a decent shock general, your armies will steamroll anything you come across. For a century or so.

This is my usual lategame army composition, is it any good? I split my armies into 88K stacks (40/8/40), and keep them split in half when on the move or defending a pre-set defensive line. ... Stellaris, Europa Universalis, Imperator: Rome, Crusader Kings, Hearts of Iron, Victoria and Cities: Skylines. Members Online. Arumba explains why EU4 ...Before each battle, hold down shift and click the consolidate button, this reshuffles your units to make as many full strength ones as possible, which in turn makes you more effective in combat. This also allows you to: Use 0 strength units to siege - right, put down your pitchforks for a second and allow me to explain.There is no 'ideal' composition. There are good ones. Start with a general, always make sure you have a general. Make your army big. Bigger armies are less likely to be engaged and less likely to lose. Start with infantry. Up to full combat width or force limit, whichever comes first. When cannons come along get at least 5, 6 is better and 10 ...Army composition and Combat Width. I’ve played eu4 since 2016 but I’ve never cared to understand this. I get the general idea, combat width means how many regiments can be on the front line, but I’m slightly confused. My combat width is 27, so I can have 27 inf/cav and 27 artillery. But I’m playing as the Netherlands and have a 23 force ...1.5K votes, 178 comments. 323K subscribers in the eu4 community. A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the grand strategy game…

give me the best army composition for mid early and late game This thread is archived New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast comments sorted by Best Top New Controversial Q&A [deleted] • Additional comment actions ... r/eu4 • Quick and dirty army composition: I/C/A = width/4/width (incl which unit type to pick) ...

This is the perfect army composition when you want to win a battle and are not constrained by force limit, money, manpower, attrition and other stuff that you might want to do with the army (sieging). So while the spreadsheet is not wrong, it is impractical for …You always can make use of more money in EU4. Saving money on cavalry means spending more on soldier households for examlpe which dramatically reduce or eliminat the need for any manpower savings that cavalry offer. Lets say for example that with a 100 force limit, you use about 25 cavalry.Army composition for every single country, with maybe like 3-5 exceptions, in the game is extremely simple: 1. Use your initial cav only till the first battle. Merge until you end up with 0. Never recruit more cavalry. 2. Always try to move with stacks of infantry equal to combat width. If combat width is 20, have a stack of 20 infantry.Due to supply limit I use stacks of 40 troops with a composition of 22/0/18 or 18/4/18. Most fights a single stack is sufficient, but for a big battle I can merge armies to fill the back row. This composition is slightly inefficient as I have too many artillery for a multi-stack battle, but my single stacks are better balanced.Importance of Artillery. There's a couple of main factors in combat in Victoria II. First of all, artillery is very powerful in terms of damage, but is easier to kill than infantry. So you want as much artillery as possible in a stack, while having an equal number of units in the front line of battle so your artillery is not exposed. Been playing EU4 off and on for a number of years now, and for a while I've been running an army composition of having 4 cavalry for every stack I have (assuming I can afford them, ofc). I picked this up several years ago, don't remember from where/who, but I'm now questioning whether this is still effective. A 5% discipline advantage turns a loss by 5% into a win by 5% and a 10% discilpine advantage in the same battle goes from 5% loss to 13% winning. The impact of modifiers really drives home what you also mentioned about the tedious micromanagement for army composition when tech changes.

Europa Universalis IV. Ideal Army Composition. Thread starter 123456798; Start date Jul 18, 2018; Jump to latest Follow Reply Menu We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive's User Agreement. . ...

Honestly unless you’re a horde, your army won’t be super different in composition from a standard army even with the cav bonuses. For a normal army you should have 4 cav in a full fighting stack. for Poland it should be more, so from 6 to 10. Don't go to the cav/inf ratio, because infantry dies more and you will have the tactics penalty.

Arumba teaches EU4 to Civilization player FilthyRobot (patch 1.18) Arumba's New Player Tutorial Series (patch 1.20) Arumba teaches EU4 to Monk004 (patch 1.28) Beginner's Guide to Coalitions 1, 2. General tip collection thread. How to revert to an older patch. Reman's War Academy Volume I - Army Composition and Basic Combat. AdministrationBut after 1.33 the composition doesn't seem to work as good as before. I barely win any fights and in most of my fights it seems like I'm starting with half the morale of my enemy. I've read the dev diaries and if I understand it correctly, the combat changes make filling up combat width more important than it was before the update.Can civilians become doctors in the U.S. Army? Visit Discovery Fit & Health to learn if civilians can become doctors in the U.S. Army. Advertisement You're interested in serving yo...It's not bad at all, you get -10% from Manchu traditions and -20% from Cossack estate. Hordes reinforce for free, so they don't have to pay extra to keep their numbers up during wars.Sort by: Gilad1. •. Build more cavalry. There really isn't an ideal composition for eu4 armies. It's to have enough infantry so that Calvary doesn't get the not enough support malus and enough infantry and Calvary that artillery will not be on the front line. Ideal army composition is enough artillery for combat width post tech 15ish and ...Flagships have the possibility to give +3 base engagement width. Each point of maneuver of your admiral increases the engagement width by 10%. So basically you have to adapt the fleet composition to the level of your admirals. Heavy ships count for three slots in your engagement width while other ships (light, galleys and transport) count for 1.Im currently playing as Germany and I just want to know what a good army composition would be. Its late game if anyone has a good composition that pairs well with Prussian ideas please share. ... The basic idea is infantry + cavalry goes in front, and artillery goes in the back. The fundamental rule is have a lot of cannons at the back, but ...the army composition depends on your tech level. early on you should go for ~60-70% inf + rest cavalry, as soon as you get cannons add ONE or TWO to the stack. start going towards your compositon after MIL 13 or so. (slowly, no need to reach that army composition before MIL 16 at least)Both horses and cannons cost a lot. While it's nice to have 50% cannons, cost is extreme and early on it's rather pointless. Filling first row with infantry and few horses, while positioning artillery at the back will put you over supply limits in most provinces, plus a seasoned general will add more benefits to mostly infantry armies than whole back row of artillery to an army with mediocre ...The "Ideal" army composistion late game is enough cannons to fill the back row, so whatever your combat width is. Then 6 or 4 calvary units for flanking attacks, then just infantry afterwards. For a 30 stack, I normally will run 16-4-10. Reply.

As far as I understand battles are treated the same whether it is 1 stack v 1 stack or 1v2 stacks. Generally I prefer to use two stacks in these cases. Your stacks should usually be slightly larger than combat width with backup infantry so that you can stay the max frontline combat width for longer. Also, having separate stacks helps with ...Tech 7: add at least 1 cannon to the fighting stack, to get +1 at siege. You may additionally make 10/0/10 siege stack, not for fighting and just for fast siege of forts level 1-3, since they are the most common. 10 infantry may be replaced with 10-16 infantry mercenaries. Tech 16 (latest tech 22): delete cavalry and fill your army with combat ...the army composition depends on your tech level. early on you should go for ~60-70% inf + rest cavalry, as soon as you get cannons add ONE or TWO to the stack. start going towards your compositon after MIL 13 or so. (slowly, no need to reach that army composition before MIL 16 at least)320K subscribers in the eu4 community. A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the grand strategy game Europa Universalis IV by…Instagram:https://instagram. teaspoon vs ounceu haul moving and storage of lemayclub space new yearsrexburg journal obituaries Go to eu4 r/eu4 • by ... Which means that the best army composition is achieved through sheer amount of money because it's so expensive to have 20+ artillery in the early to mid game. Regarding your question, half cav seems a bit much if you are playing a western nation after the first 80 or so years. It's probably good if you are Poland ... joann fabrics shawnee kscrew color gta 5 Altogether you can get 30-40% army maintenance reduction with an optional 20% using war taxes, combined with -20% regiment costs (which also reduces maintenance multiplicatively) and -30-40% cavalry cost. With aristocratic, full cossack loyalty, Polish ideas, and the regiment reduction from quantity, you can get cavalry down to 10g each, … makeup and meat jeffree star Go to eu4 r/eu4 • by sneakyplanner Army Reformer Ming trying out an odd army composition. This thread is archived New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast comments sorted by Best Top New Controversial Q&A sameth1 Statesman • Additional comment actions ...Yeah you just need to fully annex. While u/Yimris pointed out vassalizng doesnt work, if you vassalize them before they have CNs then annex them later you do get to keep their CNs as your own. if you annex or vassalize a nation, you get their subjects excluding PUs. I think that's how it's done. DON'T VASSALIZE THEM.